@inproceedings {pub5667,
	title = {Users{\textquoteright} Perception on Appropriateness of Robotic Coaching Assistant{\textquoteright}s Disclosure Behaviors},
	author = {Atikkhan Faridkhan Nilgar AND Manuel Dietrich AND Kristof Van Laerhoven},
	year = {2024},
	month = {May},
	abstract = {Social robots have emerged as valuable contributors to individuals{\textquoteright} well-being coaching. Notably, their integration into long-term human coaching trials shows particular promise, emphasizing a complementary role alongside human coaches rather than outright replacement. In this context, robots serve as supportive entities during coaching sessions, offering insights based on their knowledge about the client{\textquoteright}s well-being and activity. Traditionally, such insights have been gathered through methods like written self-reports or wearable data visualizations. However, the disclosure of client information by a robot raises concerns regarding privacy and appropriateness. To address this, we conducted an initial study (n=20) to quantify participants{\textquoteright} perceptions of privacy regarding disclosures made by robot coaching assistants. The study was conducted online, presenting participants with six prerecorded scenarios illustrating various types of information disclosure and the robot{\textquoteright}s role, ranging from proactive to on-demand communication outputs.},
	publisher = {RTSS workshop},
	booktitle = {Robot Trust for Symbiotic Societies (RTSS) workshop at ICRA 2024}
}