@inproceedings {pub4336,
	title = {Understanding Autonomous Driving as Institutional Activity: Opening New Ways to React to Discriminatory Concerns in Autonomous Driving},
	author = {Manuel Dietrich},
	year = {2020},
	month = {December},
	abstract = {We will elaborate why it is appropriate to be concerned about structural discrimination induced by future autonomous vehicles {\textendash} not only in the context of crash-optimization. In order to understand discrimination effects and potential strategies to reduce them, a novel conceptual perspective on how to frame autonomous driving is introduced. According to that, autonomous driving is considered as an institutional activity. This perspective enables us to connect to theories about institutional justice {\textendash} and open new ways to react to discriminatory concerns. To illustrate this direction, we sketch how to apply institutional justice to a system for autonomous highway driving.},
	publisher = {IOS Press},
	booktitle = {Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020 },
	editor = {Marco N{\o}rskov, Johanna Seibt, Oliver Santiago Quick},
	city = {Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington, DC},
	volume = {335},
	pages = { 373 - 383},
	series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}
}
