@inproceedings {pub3656,
	title = {Incentivizing the adoption of local flexibility options: A quantitative case study},
	author = {Tim Janke AND Bastian Brindley AND Tobias Rodemann AND Florian Steinke},
	year = {2018},
	month = {June},
	abstract = {Energy systems with a large share of generation from renewable sources require a flexible behavior of the demand side. Office buildings can technically contribute through the
installation of local co-generation and storage in combination with energy management systems. However, businesses will only consider the adoption of flexibility options if there is a clear
monetary benefit. We evaluate different combinations of flexibility options for a typical medium sized office campus in Germany regarding the incentives provided by different electricity pricing
models. We model the campus using a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation and assume perfect foresight. We find that even for the traditional static pricing model the
adoption of flexibility options is beneficial. Dynamic pricing models, however, provide substantially larger incentives.},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	booktitle = {IEEE International Conference on European Energy Market}
}